Post−Quantum Cryptography



You can secure your data from highly efficient computers known as quantum computers by using post-quantum cryptography. Simple bits that are either 0 or 1 are used by traditional computers to perform tasks. But the use of qubits-bits that can simultaneously be 0 and 1-allows quantum computers to solve some problems very quickly.

Because of highest capability, quantum computers have a chance to undermine some of the present methods of information security, like encryption. So, post-quantum cryptography focuses on creating new methods of data security that will remain useful even if quantum computing becomes more advanced.

These modern methods use complex mathematical problems that are challenging for quantum and traditional computers to solve. To protect your data, they can use networks, codes, or polynomials.

Algorithms

There are six primary algorithms available in post-quantum cryptography to protect our data −

  • Lattice-based cryptography − This method uses tricky math problems based on grids to protect data. Some examples include NTRU and ring-LWE. These methods are very strong, with NTRU encryption being studied for a long time without any major problems found.
  • Multivariate cryptography − This approach deals with complex equations and schemes like Rainbow. While some attempts at encryption using multivariate equations have failed, schemes like Rainbow could still offer good security, especially for digital signatures.
  • Hash-based cryptography − These methods use hashing, like Lamport signatures, to protect data. They were invented a while ago but have become popular again because they're tough for quantum computers to crack. Examples include XMSS and SPHINCS.
  • Code-based cryptography − This type relies on error-correcting codes to protect data. The McEliece encryption algorithm has been around for over 40 years and is still holding up well against attacks. It's seen as a good option for long-term protection against quantum computer attacks.
  • Isogeny-based cryptography − This method uses properties of elliptic curves to create secure systems. Examples include CSIDH for key exchange and SQISign for signatures. While some schemes have been broken, others remain strong and could replace current encryption methods.
  • Symmetric key quantum resistance − Some encryption methods, like AES, are already very safe against quantum computers, as long as you use big enough keys. Systems like Kerberos, which use symmetric keys instead of public keys, are also safe against quantum attacks and are being recommended for wider use.

Advantages

Below are some advantages we need to consider while using Post-Quantum Cryptography −

  • Post-quantum cryptography is very effective at securing our information with ultra-powerful computers known as quantum computers. These computers are capable of breaking standard security methods, while post-quantum cryptography has been designed to deal with attacks like this.
  • Using post-quantum cryptography today is like installing a super-strong lock on your door before attackers get better tools. It helps keep your data safe, no matter how much quantum computing advances.
  • Post-quantum cryptography can be done in a variety of methods, like using grids, unique codes, and other techniques. This means we have a wide range of options to pick from. It is depending on what works best for every situation.
  • And groups are trying to verify that everyone is using the same post-quantum cryptography methods. This allows the collaboration of many systems while also ensuring privacy and security of all.

Disadvantages

There are some disadvantages of Post-Quantum Cryptography −

  • Some post-quantum cryptography methods may need more resources than classical encryption methods. This can result in greater computational overhead as well as less performance in some applications, mainly on devices with limited processing power.
  • Changing from old cryptographic methods to post-quantum cryptography can be challenging and costly for organisations. It can be important to update old systems, protocols, and infrastructure, as well as retrain workers, in order to successfully understand and implement new cryptographic algorithms.
  • While many of the suggested algorithms for post-quantum cryptography are still in the research and development stage, the field shows interest. There are questions over their maturity and efficiency in real-world applications because they can not have undergone sufficient testing and validation in the real world.

Future of Quantum Cryptography

In the future, the way we keep our information secure can change because of quantum computing. The methods we use, like public-key cryptography, are sufficient for online shopping and other activities we do on the internet. But quantum computers, which are super powerful, could make these methods less effective.

It might take about nine or ten years before quantum computers become powerful enough to break the encryption we use today. So, experts are working hard to find new ways to keep our data safe, even from these super computers. One group called NIST is especially focused on creating a new standard for this kind of encryption.

While all of this is going on, experts recommend that businesses and organisations begin planning for the change. They advocate keeping track of the various encryption methods available and preparing how to update or replace those we now use when the time comes. This way, when the new encryption standard is complete, we should be ready to protect our information in the future.

Quantum Cryptography vs. Post Quantum Cryptography

The following table highlights the major differences between Quantum Cryptography and Post-Quantum Cryptography −

S.No. Quantum Cryptography Post Quantum Cryptography
1. The quantum cryptography describes how the principles of quantum mechanics can be used in cryptography. A set of methods known as "post-quantum cryptography" are believed to be resistant to attacks by quantum computers.
2. Quantum physics suggests that a quantum channel cannot be intercepted correctly without detection. Algorithms will be examined in order to determine their reliability, but there is no guarantee that someone will one day find a way to break them.
3. Implementation will require the use of specific hardware. The majority of implementations will be software-only and will not require the usage of special hardware.
4. Only works with optical communications over a free-space optical fibre. It is compatible with all digital communication media, like RF wireless networks and optical communications.
5. Higher costs due to the need for new hardware and communications infrastructure. Software-based synthesis solutions will be relatively low-cost.
6. Receiving a Quantum channel, decoding to classical bits, and re-encrypting and broadcasting to another Quantum channel makes a repeater conceivable. Compliant with today's digital repeater technology.
7. The number of options is really limited. Only line-of-sight nodes should be utilized. Compatible with any form of mobile device communications.
8. It's possible that it may be utilized for digital signatures, but it's improbable. Different versions of the standards are being developed expressly for the use of digital signatures.
Advertisements