![Quantitative Aptitude Tutorial](/quantitative_aptitude/images/aptitude-mini-logo.jpg)
- Aptitude Test Preparation
- Aptitude - Home
- Aptitude - Overview
- Quantitative Aptitude
- Aptitude Useful Resources
- Aptitude - Questions & Answers
Line Charts - Online Quiz
Following quiz provides Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) related to Line Charts. You will have to read all the given answers and click over the correct answer. If you are not sure about the answer then you can check the answer using Show Answer button. You can use Next Quiz button to check new set of questions in the quiz.
![Questions and Answers](/images/questions_and_answers.png)
Directions: The chart given underneath demonstrates the assembling volume (in kg), expense value (Rs. /kg) and offering value (Rs. /kg) of an article over year. Study the chart and answer the question given below:
![Cost Price Vs Selling Price over the years](/quantitative_aptitude/images/line_graph3.jpg)
Q 1 - In which of the next years was the expense/deal value proportion the most minimal?
Answer - D
Explanation
expense and deals value proportion : 2000= 12/14 =0.857, 2001 = 10/12 = 0.833, 2002 = 14/12 = 7/6, 2003 = 18/17.5 = 1.028 2004 =22/24 = 0.916, 2005 = 28/29.5 = 0.949
Directions: The chart given underneath demonstrates the assembling volume (in kg), expense value (Rs. /kg) and offering value (Rs. /kg) of an article over year. Study the chart and answer the question given below:
![Cost Price Vs Selling Price over the years](/quantitative_aptitude/images/line_graph3.jpg)
Q 2 - In the event that the percent development for the expense proceeds from 2005 to 2006 as from 2004 to 2005, what be the aggregate expense per kg in 2006?
Answer - B
Explanation
Percent development in expense from 2004 to 2005 . = {(28-22)/22*100} % = (6/22*100) % = 300/11% Taken a toll for every Kg in 2006 = Rs. [28+ (300/11 *1/100* 28)] = Rs. 392/11 = Rs. 35.63
Directions: Study the graph below carefully and answer the following:
![Profit earned over the years](/quantitative_aptitude/images/line_graph4.jpg)
Q 3 - In which year the % expansion in the benefit from that of the earlier year is the most elevated?
Answer - B
Explanation
gain % in: 2002 = {(50-20/20)*100} % = 150%, 2004 = {(50-40/40)*100} %= 25%, 2005 = {(55-50/50)*100} % = 10%, 2006 = {(70-55/55)*100} % = 27.3%, 2007 = {(75-70/70)*100} % = 7.1% So, the gain% is highest in 2002.
Directions: Study the graph below carefully and answer the following:
![Profit earned over the years](/quantitative_aptitude/images/line_graph4.jpg)
Q 4 - On the off chance that the salary in the year 2001 was Rs. 60 crore and the use of that year squares with the use of the year 2003, what was the salary of the organization in crore rupees in 2003?
Answer - A
Explanation
Expenditure in 2001 =( 60-25) = 35 crore ∴ income in the year 2003 = (35+40) = 75 crores.
Directions: Study the graph below carefully and answer the following:
![Cars Sold over the years](/quantitative_aptitude/images/line_graph5.jpg)
Q 5 - Deals in the year 2004 for organization A structures what % of aggregate offers of organization A for every one of the years together?
Answer - A
Explanation
Total sale of Company A in 2004 =1100 Total sale of A during These years = (600+900+300+600+1100+1000+1100)= 5600 Required % = (1100/5600*100) % = 19.64%
Directions: Study the graph below carefully and answer the following:
![Cars Sold over the years](/quantitative_aptitude/images/line_graph5.jpg)
Q 6 - Which of the accompanying mixes of year and% ascend in deals from the earlier year for organization is right?
Answer - B
Explanation
percent rise in sales in 2003 = {(600-300/600)*100}% = 100% Percent rise in sales in 2004 = {(1100-600/600)*100} % = 83.33% ∴ Rise in 2004 by 83.33% is correct.
Directions: Study the graph below carefully and answer the following:
![Cars Sold over the years](/quantitative_aptitude/images/line_graph5.jpg)
Q 7 - Amid which year the percent rise/fall in deals from the earlier year was the most elevated for Organization A?
Answer - D
Explanation
In the year 2003,A has 100% rise. In the year 2002, we have fall% = {(900-300/600)*100} = 66.67% So, the highest change is in 2003.
Directions: Study the graph below carefully and answer the following:
![Unit Produced Vs Units Exported over the years](/quantitative_aptitude/images/line_graph6.jpg)
Q 8 - In which year the contrast between the units delivered and sent out is the greatest?
Answer - B
Explanation
difference between units produced and exported in various years is given by : 2003 = 3 crore, 2001 = 2 crore, 2002 = 5 crore, 2003 = 3 crore, 2004 = 4 crore, 2005 = 2 crore, 2006 = 4 crore, 2007 = 3 crore Maximum difference is in the year 2002.
Directions: Study the graph below carefully and answer the following:
![Unit Produced Vs Units Exported over the years](/quantitative_aptitude/images/line_graph6.jpg)
Q 9 - In which year the percent of units sent out to the units delivered is the most extreme?
Answer - C
Explanation
Percentage of units exported to units produced in various years is given by: 2000 = (3/6*100) % = 50%, 2001 = (4/6*100) %= 66.6% 2002= (2/7*100) % = 28.5%, 2003 = (5/8*100) % = 62.5% 2004 = (5/9*100) % = 55.5%, 2005 = (6/8*100) % = 75% 2006 = (5/9*100) % = 55.5%, 2007 = (7/10*100) % = 70% So, it is the maximum in the year 2005
Directions: Study the graph below carefully and answer the following:
![Unit Produced Vs Units Exported over the years](/quantitative_aptitude/images/line_graph6.jpg)
Q 10 - In which year, the percent ascend in units delivered from the former year, is the most extreme?
Answer - D
Explanation
Required % in 2002 = {(7-6)/6* 100} % = 16.67%, 2003 = {(8-7)/7*100} % =14.28%, 2004 = {(9-8)/8* 100} % =12.5%, 2006 ={(9-8)/8* 100}% =12.5% 2007 = {(10-9)/9* 100} % =11.1% ∴ It is maximum in the year 2002.