Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js

Discrete Mathematics - Rules of Inference



To deduce new statements from the statements whose truth that we already know, Rules of Inference are used.

What are Rules of Inference for?

Mathematical logic is often used for logical proofs. Proofs are valid arguments that determine the truth values of mathematical statements.

An argument is a sequence of statements. The last statement is the conclusion and all its preceding statements are called premises (or hypothesis). The symbol , (read therefore) is placed before the conclusion. A valid argument is one where the conclusion follows from the truth values of the premises.

Rules of Inference provide the templates or guidelines for constructing valid arguments from the statements that we already have.

Table of Rules of Inference

Rule of Inference Name Rule of Inference Name

PPQ

Addition

PQ¬PQ

Disjunctive Syllogism

PQPQ

Conjunction

PQQRPR

Hypothetical Syllogism

PQP

Simplification

(PQ)(RS)PRQS

Constructive Dilemma

PQPQ

Modus Ponens

(PQ)(RS)¬Q¬S¬P¬R

Destructive Dilemma

PQ¬Q¬P

Modus Tollens

Addition

If P is a premise, we can use Addition rule to derive PQ.

PPQ

Example

Let P be the proposition, He studies very hard is true

Therefore − "Either he studies very hard Or he is a very bad student." Here Q is the proposition he is a very bad student.

Conjunction

If P and Q are two premises, we can use Conjunction rule to derive PQ.

PQPQ

Example

Let P − He studies very hard

Let Q − He is the best boy in the class

Therefore − "He studies very hard and he is the best boy in the class"

Simplification

If PQ is a premise, we can use Simplification rule to derive P.

PQP

Example

"He studies very hard and he is the best boy in the class", PQ

Therefore − "He studies very hard"

Modus Ponens

If P and PQ are two premises, we can use Modus Ponens to derive Q.

PQPQ

Example

"If you have a password, then you can log on to facebook", PQ

"You have a password", P

Therefore − "You can log on to facebook"

Modus Tollens

If PQ and ¬Q are two premises, we can use Modus Tollens to derive ¬P.

PQ¬Q¬P

Example

"If you have a password, then you can log on to facebook", PQ

"You cannot log on to facebook", ¬Q

Therefore − "You do not have a password "

Disjunctive Syllogism

If ¬P and PQ are two premises, we can use Disjunctive Syllogism to derive Q.

¬PPQQ

Example

"The ice cream is not vanilla flavored", ¬P

"The ice cream is either vanilla flavored or chocolate flavored", PQ

Therefore − "The ice cream is chocolate flavored

Hypothetical Syllogism

If PQ and QR are two premises, we can use Hypothetical Syllogism to derive PR

PQQRPR

Example

"If it rains, I shall not go to school, PQ

"If I don't go to school, I won't need to do homework", QR

Therefore − "If it rains, I won't need to do homework"

Constructive Dilemma

If (PQ)(RS) and PR are two premises, we can use constructive dilemma to derive QS.

(PQ)(RS)PRQS

Example

If it rains, I will take a leave, (PQ)

If it is hot outside, I will go for a shower, (RS)

Either it will rain or it is hot outside, PR

Therefore − "I will take a leave or I will go for a shower"

Destructive Dilemma

If (PQ)(RS) and ¬Q¬S are two premises, we can use destructive dilemma to derive ¬P¬R.

(PQ)(RS)¬Q¬S¬P¬R

Example

If it rains, I will take a leave, (PQ)

If it is hot outside, I will go for a shower, (RS)

Either I will not take a leave or I will not go for a shower, ¬Q¬S

Therefore − "Either it does not rain or it is not hot outside"

Advertisements